“Once Upon A Time in Mexico” (2003) [R]

     2003 was a decent year for the cinema industry, with the finishing of the “Lord of the Rings” and the beginning of the “Pirates of the Caribbean” series. At the top of the list of the best movies of 2003 is the Robert Rodriguez film “Once Upon A Time in Mexico.” It is the conclusion to his “El Mariachi” trilogy starring Antonio Banderas, Johnny Depp, Willem Dafoe, and Mickey Rourke. Each of these actors gave incredible performances, although Depp almost steals the show with his witty character. It is almost too obviously a tribute to Sergio Leone’s “Man with no name” trilogy, and does a very good job of being a sort of hats-off to Leone’s trilogy. The script was incredible and clever with coatings of dark humor. If there’s any reason not to watch this show, it would be that there are a few scenes that are not for the queasy types.
     This movie couldn’t go wrong with the major cast that it had. Antonio Banderas returns as the “el mariachi” character and shows that he will never tire of the role. Dafoe and Rourke also give amazing enactments as the greedy and murderous villains. However, Johnny Depp nearly steals the spotlight as the entertaining character. He plays an F.B.I. agent whose debut to the trilogy is this final installment. His performance as the agent is possibly one of his best yet and will forever stay near the top of that list. It’s not by actor’s roles alone, however, that makes this film an exciting one.

     In the sixties Sergio Leone released a trilogy of westerns known to many as the “Man with no name” trilogy which features Clint Eastwood. The third in that trilogy is entitled “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” and it was a turning point for spaghetti westerns throughout the world. Rodriguez’s “El Mariachi” trilogy is clearly his tribute to Leone’s own trilogy, and “Once Upon A Time in Mexico” is the most interesting one from Rodriguez. His trilogy is much like Leone’s because it too is very western style, and it features actors who can easily portray the “tough-guy” act. Another similarity between the two trilogies is that each installment doesn’t really have much to do with their sibling installments; each one is its own movie, and they do well on individually.

     As I always say, one of the most important things to look for in a movie is how well the script is written, and this one is incredible. Full of clever and dark humor, it could almost be read as a story by itself. There are several ingenious gadgets which belong to Depp’s agent character, and he makes devastating and slightly comical use of each of his gadgets. The dialogue and action competes well with many top-of-the-line productions, and the story itself is almost a tragic sort of action tale. The tragedy and suspense hides around every corner of what might be Rodriquez’s best movie to date. There is, although, one thing about this picture that may lessen the number of its audience. A few gruesome scenes in the film are not recommended for queasy movie-goers.  Those scenes aren’t necessary to the story and can be avoided by watching the edited-for-television version if all else fails.

          My overall rating: 4 out of 5

“From Dusk Till Dawn” (1996) [R]

     “From Dusk Till Dawn” is a turn in filmmaking for Robert Rodriguez. It was the first of his movies to have vampires. The screenplay is commendable, along with the fact that this picture was one of the first to change genres halfway through and the cinematography was experimental to say the least. The one disadvantage to this film is that it is too similar to other Rodriguez movies, which shows that he makes incredible flicks, but only does so with one type.

     The screenplay of this film is commendable for its action and its surprises. Written by Quentin Tarantino, the script has action that almost never stops. The movie is meant to be action-packed, nothing else, and it answers to that call. It also contains a few twists and turns for the viewers; if for some reason the surprises don’t hold enough of the viewer’s interests, then the action most certainly will keep their attention.

     The genre for this show is a little more difficult to pin down than it is for others. The story starts out as a crime action and takes a major turn about halfway through. Just when the audience gets used to watching a movie about criminals on the lamb, it changes like an animal going one direction and suddenly deciding to go completely the other way. It changes into a horror film when the criminals find themselves in the company of vampires. Such an interesting twist can make or break how well the viewers will enjoy this movie.

     Robert Rodriguez showed the world some of his best cinematography with this movie. He made sure the cameras shot everything just the way he wanted and when it came time for the edit he set the filming in the perfect order to compliment the story and give the audience the full view of everything that happened. He also used it as a chance to do some experimental cinematography which led the way for some lower end directors. This new style of filming was to make the audience feel as if they were in a video game during the high-paced action shots; it works incredibly well with Tarantino’s screenplay.

     The main weakness of “From Dusk Till Dawn” is that it is far too similar to other works that Rodriguez and Tarantino have done. They have time and time again proven that they can make intriguing crime action features, which will tell movie-goers, one thing: they need to show that they can do well on other types of motion pictures as well. After watching many other Tarantino or Rodriguez pictures people can begin to get the idea that they enjoy making only action thrillers. This is all well and good, but truly amazing filmmakers throughout history have been able to show that they are adept at many different styles. Although this movie was one of their first takes on horror stories, it just has too much in common with their other projects.

          My overall rating: 2.5 out of 5